1. Introduction

Microorganisms are the most abundant and diverse forms of life on Earth, playing indispensable roles in maintaining ecosystem structure, function, and stability. They drive essential biogeochemical processes, including carbon sequestration, nitrogen fixation, phosphorus cycling, sulfur metabolism, and the decomposition of organic matter. These microbial activities sustain soil fertility, regulate water quality, support plant productivity, and contribute significantly to global climate regulation. Despite their ecological importance, only a small proportion of environmental microorganisms can be cultivated under conventional laboratory conditions, leaving the majority of microbial diversity unexplored. These limitations have substantially constrained our understanding of microbial diversity, community dynamics, and the ecological functions performed by microorganisms across natural and engineered ecosystems [1-2]. The advent of metagenomics has fundamentally transformed environmental microbiology by enabling the culture-independent characterization of microbial communities through the direct sequencing of environmental DNA (eDNA) extracted from diverse environmental matrices. In contrast to conventional microbiological approaches that depend on the isolation and cultivation of individual microorganisms, metagenomic analyses simultaneously capture the collective genetic repertoire (metagenome) of entire microbial assemblages. This holistic approach provides high-resolution insights into microbial taxonomic diversity, community structure, functional gene composition, metabolic capabilities, and intricate ecological interactions. By overcoming the cultivation bias that excludes the vast majority of environmental microorganisms, metagenomics has dramatically expanded our understanding of previously uncultivable and taxonomically uncharacterized microorganisms, revealing their fundamental contributions to ecosystem functioning, biogeochemical cycling, and environmental resilience. Consequently, metagenomics has become a cornerstone technology for investigating the complexity, functionality, and evolutionary dynamics of microbial ecosystems across diverse environmental settings [3-5]. Since the first environmental metagenomic studies were reported in the late 1990s and early 2000s, advances in molecular biology, next-generation sequencing (NGS), high-throughput computing, and bioinformatics have accelerated the development of environmental metagenomics. Modern sequencing platforms now generate millions to billions of DNA sequences within a single experiment, enabling detailed characterization of microbial communities inhabiting soil, freshwater, marine ecosystems, sediments, glaciers, deserts, wastewater treatment plants, agricultural fields, and even the atmosphere. These technological developments have facilitated the discovery of numerous novel microbial taxa, functional genes, metabolic pathways, and enzymes with ecological, industrial, and biomedical significance.

Environmental metagenomics has become an essential tool for environmental monitoring because microbial communities respond rapidly to physical, chemical, and biological changes in their surroundings. Variations in microbial diversity and functional gene abundance often serve as early indicators of ecosystem disturbance caused by pollution, climate change, land-use alteration, eutrophication, heavy metal contamination, or habitat degradation. Consequently, metagenomic approaches are increasingly being employed to assess environmental quality, evaluate ecosystem health, identify microbial biomarkers, and support evidence-based environmental management strategies [6-7]. In recent years, environmental metagenomics has found wide-ranging applications across numerous disciplines. In agriculture, it is used to characterize soil microbiomes associated with nutrient cycling, plant growth promotion, and disease suppression. In aquatic ecosystems, metagenomics facilitates the monitoring of microbial diversity, harmful algal blooms, water quality, and emerging pathogens. Environmental scientists utilize metagenomic analyses to identify microorganisms capable of degrading hydrocarbons, pesticides, plastics, pharmaceuticals, and other environmental contaminants, thereby supporting the development of sustainable bioremediation technologies. Additionally, wastewater-based metagenomic surveillance has gained considerable importance for tracking antibiotic resistance genes, monitoring infectious diseases, and evaluating public health risks.

The integration of environmental metagenomics with emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, cloud computing, metabolomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and remote sensing has further enhanced the ability to interpret complex microbial datasets. These multidisciplinary approaches enable researchers to predict ecosystem responses, identify functional interactions within microbial communities, and develop more accurate environmental monitoring systems. Such innovations are expected to strengthen global efforts toward biodiversity conservation, sustainable resource management, climate change adaptation, and environmental restoration [8-9]. Despite remarkable progress, several challenges continue to limit the broader application of environmental metagenomics. High sequencing costs, computational demands, incomplete microbial reference databases, methodological variability, and difficulties in linking taxonomic information with ecological function remain important obstacles. Furthermore, standardized sampling procedures, analytical pipelines, and data interpretation frameworks are required to ensure reproducibility and comparability among studies. Addressing these challenges through technological innovation and international collaboration will further expand the role of metagenomics in environmental research [10-12]. Therefore, environmental metagenomics represents one of the most powerful approaches for investigating microbial diversity and ecosystem function. By integrating advanced sequencing technologies with sophisticated bioinformatics and ecological analyses, it provides unprecedented opportunities for environmental biomonitoring, pollution assessment, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable ecosystem management. This review discusses the principles of environmental metagenomics, emerging sequencing technologies, analytical tools, major environmental applications, current challenges, and future perspectives for promoting ecological sustainability.

2. Fundamentals of Environmental Metagenomics

Environmental metagenomics is a culture-independent, high-throughput molecular approach that enables the direct extraction, sequencing, and comprehensive analysis of total genomic DNA recovered from environmental matrices. Unlike conventional cultivation-based microbiological methods, which are inherently limited by the inability to culture the majority of environmental microorganisms under laboratory conditions, metagenomics facilitates the simultaneous characterization of entire microbial assemblages, including bacteria, archaea, fungi, viruses, protists, and other microbial eukaryotes. By eliminating cultivation bias, this approach provides an unbiased and holistic view of microbial community composition, functional diversity, and ecological dynamics, thereby transforming our understanding of microbial ecology and ecosystem functioning [13].

The term metagenome refers to the collective genetic complement of all microorganisms inhabiting a specific environment and represents the cumulative metabolic and functional potential of a microbial community. Environmental DNA (eDNA) isolated from diverse habitats—including soils, freshwater systems, marine environments, sediments, wastewater, atmospheric aerosols, glaciers, geothermal springs, and other extreme ecosystems—constitutes the primary substrate for metagenomic investigations. High-throughput sequencing of eDNA enables comprehensive characterization of microbial taxonomic diversity, identification of functional and adaptive genes, reconstruction of metabolic and biogeochemical pathways, detection of antimicrobial resistance and virulence determinants, and elucidation of complex ecological interactions governing microbial community assembly and ecosystem processes.

A typical environmental metagenomic workflow comprises a series of integrated experimental and computational stages designed to maximize data quality and biological interpretation. The process begins with strategically designed sampling protocols that minimize contamination, preserve nucleic acid integrity, and ensure representative recovery of microbial communities. This is followed by the extraction of high-quality genomic DNA using optimized protocols tailored to specific environmental matrices, thereby minimizing inhibitor carryover and maximizing DNA yield. Following rigorous quality assessment and quantification, sequencing libraries are constructed and analyzed using high-throughput sequencing platforms, including short-read and long-read technologies, to generate comprehensive genomic datasets [14].

Subsequent computational analyses employ advanced bioinformatics pipelines incorporating sequence quality control, host-sequence removal, de novo assembly, genome binning, taxonomic profiling, gene prediction, functional annotation, metabolic pathway reconstruction, comparative genomics, and multivariate ecological analyses. Increasingly, machine learning algorithms, genome-resolved metagenomics, and multi-omics integration are incorporated to enhance taxonomic resolution, predict microbial functions, and characterize ecological networks within complex microbial ecosystems. These analytical advances have established environmental metagenomics as a cornerstone technology for investigating microbial biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, biogeochemical cycling, environmental health, and microbial responses to anthropogenic and climatic disturbances, thereby supporting evidence-based environmental monitoring, biomonitoring, ecological risk assessment, and sustainable ecosystem management.

Two principal metagenomic approaches are widely employed in environmental studies. The first is amplicon sequencing, which targets highly conserved genetic markers such as the bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene, the fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, or the 18S rRNA gene of eukaryotic microorganisms. Amplicon sequencing provides detailed taxonomic information and enables comparative analyses of microbial community composition across environmental samples. Because of its relatively low cost and high analytical efficiency, it is widely used for biodiversity assessments and environmental monitoring [15]. The second approach is shotgun metagenomic sequencing, in which all DNA fragments extracted from an environmental sample are sequenced without prior amplification of specific genes. This technique offers considerably greater resolution by simultaneously identifying microorganisms and characterizing their functional genes, metabolic pathways, antimicrobial resistance determinants, and ecological capabilities. Shotgun metagenomics is particularly valuable for studying microbial metabolism, biogeochemical cycling, pollutant degradation, host–microbe interactions, and ecosystem functioning [16]. Recent developments in next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have significantly increased sequencing throughput while reducing analytical costs. High-throughput platforms such as Illumina generate billions of highly accurate DNA reads, whereas third-generation sequencing technologies including Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) and Oxford Nanopore Technologies produce long DNA reads that improve genome assembly and facilitate the reconstruction of complete microbial genomes from complex environmental samples. These advances have greatly expanded the scope of environmental metagenomic investigations.

Bioinformatics has become an integral component of environmental metagenomics due to the enormous volume of sequencing data generated during analysis. Sophisticated computational tools are used for sequence assembly, genome binning, taxonomic identification, phylogenetic analysis, gene annotation, metabolic pathway reconstruction, and statistical interpretation. Public databases such as NCBI GenBank, SILVA, Greengenes, KEGG, Pfam, and eggNOG provide reference information for identifying microbial taxa and predicting gene functions. Continuous improvements in machine learning and artificial intelligence are further enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of metagenomic data analysis [17]. Environmental metagenomics provides both taxonomic and functional information. Taxonomic profiling identifies microbial species and community composition, whereas functional metagenomics reveals genes associated with nutrient cycling, carbon fixation, nitrogen metabolism, methane production, sulfur transformation, heavy metal resistance, xenobiotic degradation, and antibiotic resistance. This dual capability enables comprehensive assessment of ecosystem health and microbial responses to environmental disturbances.

Today, environmental metagenomics serves as a cornerstone of modern environmental science by enabling researchers to investigate microbial biodiversity, discover novel microorganisms and enzymes, monitor environmental quality, evaluate ecosystem resilience, and support sustainable management of natural resources. Continued advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies, computational biology, artificial intelligence-driven bioinformatics, and multi-omics integration are expected to further enhance the analytical power and application of environmental metagenomics. These technological innovations will enable more comprehensive characterization of microbial diversity, functional potential, and ecosystem processes across diverse environmental systems. Consequently, environmental metagenomics is poised to become an indispensable platform for addressing major global environmental challenges, including climate change, biodiversity loss, environmental pollution, antimicrobial resistance, and ecosystem degradation. By providing high-resolution insights into microbial ecosystem functioning and biogeochemical processes, metagenomics will play a pivotal role in supporting evidence-based environmental monitoring, ecological risk assessment, conservation planning, and sustainable ecosystem management under rapidly changing global environmental conditions.

3. Sequencing Technologies in Environmental Metagenomics

The rapid evolution of DNA sequencing technologies has substantially expanded the analytical capabilities and resolution of environmental metagenomics, enabling comprehensive investigation of microbial communities across diverse ecosystems. Modern high-throughput sequencing (HTS) platforms facilitate large-scale analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA), generating extensive genomic datasets that support high-resolution characterization of microbial taxonomic diversity, community composition, functional gene repertoires, and ecological dynamics. These technological advancements have greatly improved the capacity to investigate complex microbial ecosystems, uncover previously uncharacterized microorganisms, and elucidate their roles in ecosystem functioning and biogeochemical processes.

Selection of an appropriate sequencing platform is determined by multiple factors, including read length, sequencing accuracy, throughput, error profile, computational requirements, cost-effectiveness, and the specific objectives of the investigation. The choice of sequencing technology also depends on the intended analytical application, such as taxonomic profiling, genome-resolved metagenomics, functional gene annotation, comparative metagenomics, detection of low-abundance taxa, or reconstruction of complete microbial genomes. Therefore, optimizing sequencing platform selection is critical for maximizing data quality, analytical resolution, and the biological interpretation of environmental metagenomic datasets. These technologies have improved the detection of rare microorganisms, genome reconstruction, and functional gene analysis, making environmental metagenomics a valuable tool for biodiversity assessment and ecosystem monitoring [18]. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, particularly Illumina platforms, continue to dominate environmental metagenomic research owing to their exceptional sequencing accuracy, high throughput, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. Illumina sequencing is extensively employed for both targeted amplicon sequencing, such as 16S rRNA gene profiling, and whole-community shotgun metagenomic analyses, providing robust datasets for taxonomic characterization, microbial diversity assessment, and functional gene identification. The widespread adoption of Illumina technology has established it as the benchmark platform for high-resolution microbial community analysis across diverse environmental ecosystems.

The emergence of third-generation sequencing technologies, including Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT), has further advanced metagenomic research by enabling the generation of long and ultra-long DNA reads that substantially improve genome assembly, structural variant detection, plasmid characterization, and recovery of high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from complex microbial communities. Long-read sequencing also facilitates the resolution of repetitive genomic regions, mobile genetic elements, and complete operons that are often fragmented in short-read datasets, thereby providing more comprehensive insights into microbial genome architecture and functional potential. Although third-generation platforms have historically exhibited higher sequencing error rates than short-read technologies, continuous improvements in sequencing chemistry, instrument performance, base-calling algorithms, and hybrid error-correction strategies have markedly enhanced sequencing accuracy and genome completeness. Consequently, integrated short-read and long-read sequencing approaches are increasingly adopted to exploit the complementary strengths of both technologies, enabling more accurate, genome-resolved characterization of environmental microbiomes and their ecological functions [19]. Combining short-read and long-read sequencing has emerged as an effective strategy for producing highly accurate and complete metagenomic assemblies. Hybrid sequencing approaches integrate the accuracy of Illumina reads with the long-range information provided by PacBio or Nanopore sequencing, thereby improving genome reconstruction and functional annotation.

4. Bioinformatics Tools and Data Analysis

Bioinformatics is an essential component of environmental metagenomics because sequencing technologies generate millions of DNA sequences that require extensive computational analysis. Modern bioinformatics pipelines enable researchers to transform raw sequence data into meaningful biological information by identifying microbial taxa, predicting gene functions, reconstructing metabolic pathways, and comparing microbial communities across environmental samples [20]. The bioinformatics workflow for environmental metagenomic analysis typically begins with rigorous quality control to remove low-quality reads, sequencing artifacts, adapter contamination, chimeric sequences, and other technical errors that may compromise downstream analyses. Following quality filtering, high-confidence sequence reads are assembled into longer contiguous sequences (contigs) using advanced de novo assembly algorithms, thereby improving genome reconstruction and facilitating comprehensive characterization of microbial communities. Taxonomic assignment is subsequently performed by comparing assembled sequences against curated reference databases, including SILVA, Greengenes, RefSeq, and NCBI GenBank, enabling accurate identification and phylogenetic classification of microbial taxa across diverse environmental samples.

Functional characterization is achieved through gene prediction and annotation using specialized bioinformatics pipelines and reference databases, allowing the identification of genes involved in essential biological processes such as microbial metabolism, biogeochemical nutrient cycling, xenobiotic and pollutant degradation, antimicrobial resistance, stress response, and environmental adaptation. These analyses provide critical insights into the functional potential and ecological roles of microbial communities, supporting the elucidation of ecosystem processes, microbial interactions, and environmental responses to natural and anthropogenic disturbances. Increasingly, genome-resolved metagenomics and pathway reconstruction approaches are integrated into these workflows to establish direct links between microbial taxonomic composition, functional capabilities, and ecosystem functioning [21]. Several specialized software packages have been developed for metagenomic analysis. QIIME2 and Mothur are widely used for amplicon sequence analysis, whereas Kraken2, MetaPhlAn, and Kaiju perform rapid taxonomic classification. MEGAHIT and MetaSPAdes facilitate metagenome assembly, while PROKKA, KEGG, eggNOG, and Pfam support genome annotation and functional prediction. Increasingly, artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms are being integrated into bioinformatics workflows to improve taxonomic classification, predict microbial interactions, and identify ecological biomarkers.

5. Applications of Environmental Metagenomics

Environmental metagenomics has become an indispensable tool for investigating microbial communities across terrestrial, aquatic, and engineered ecosystems. By providing detailed information on microbial diversity and functional potential, metagenomics supports environmental monitoring, biodiversity conservation, pollution assessment, and sustainable ecosystem management [22]. In agricultural soils, metagenomic studies identify microorganisms involved in nutrient cycling, nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization, and plant growth promotion. Changes in soil microbial communities also serve as indicators of soil fertility, land degradation, and the impact of agricultural practices. In freshwater and marine ecosystems, metagenomics facilitates the monitoring of microbial diversity, harmful algal blooms, water quality, and pathogen occurrence. These analyses contribute to the conservation of aquatic biodiversity and the management of drinking water resources [23]. Metagenomic approaches are increasingly used in wastewater treatment systems to monitor microbial populations responsible for nutrient removal and organic matter degradation. Wastewater surveillance has also emerged as an effective strategy for detecting antibiotic resistance genes, viral pathogens, and other public health threats. In addition, metagenomics enables the discovery of novel microorganisms and enzymes with applications in biotechnology, pharmaceuticals, agriculture, and industrial processes.

6. Metagenomics in Pollution Monitoring and Bioremediation

Environmental pollution caused by industrialization, urbanization, mining, agriculture, and improper waste disposal has become a major global concern. Microbial communities play a critical role in the natural degradation of environmental contaminants, and environmental metagenomics has emerged as a powerful tool for identifying microorganisms and functional genes involved in these processes [24]. Metagenomic analyses enable researchers to detect genes responsible for the biodegradation of hydrocarbons, pesticides, plastics, pharmaceutical residues, and other organic pollutants. Similarly, microbial genes associated with heavy metal resistance and detoxification provide valuable information for assessing contaminated environments and developing remediation strategies. Functional metagenomics has facilitated the discovery of previously unknown enzymes capable of degrading complex environmental pollutants, thereby supporting sustainable bioremediation technologies [25]. Metagenomics also contributes to environmental risk assessment by identifying antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), virulence factors, and emerging microbial pathogens in wastewater, rivers, and agricultural environments. These findings are increasingly used to evaluate ecosystem health and guide environmental management policies.

 

7. Metagenomics and Ecological Sustainability

Metagenomics contributes to ecological sustainability by improving understanding of ecosystem functions, biodiversity conservation, and environmental resilience. Microbial indicators derived from metagenomic data can be used to evaluate ecosystem health and guide sustainable management practices.

9. Conclusion

Environmental metagenomics has emerged as a cornerstone technology in contemporary microbial ecology, fundamentally transforming the investigation of microbial diversity, ecosystem functioning, and environmental health through culture-independent genomic analyses. Continuous advancements in high-throughput sequencing technologies, bioinformatics, and computational biology have greatly enhanced the resolution and analytical capacity of metagenomic studies, enabling comprehensive characterization of microbial community composition, functional potential, and ecological interactions across diverse terrestrial, freshwater, marine, atmospheric, and engineered ecosystems. These developments have significantly expanded our understanding of the pivotal roles that microorganisms play in biogeochemical cycling, ecosystem resilience, and environmental sustainability. The broad applicability of environmental metagenomics has established it as an indispensable tool for biomonitoring, environmental quality assessment, pollution surveillance, bioremediation, antimicrobial resistance monitoring, pathogen detection, biodiversity conservation, climate change research, and ecological risk assessment. By generating high-resolution molecular data, metagenomic approaches support evidence-based environmental management, facilitate early detection of ecological disturbances, and strengthen conservation and restoration strategies under rapidly changing environmental conditions. Despite these advances, several challenges continue to limit the full realization of environmental metagenomics, including the lack of standardized sampling and analytical protocols, computational demands associated with large-scale sequencing datasets, incomplete reference genome databases, difficulties in functional annotation, and the challenge of linking microbial genetic potential to in situ ecological processes. Addressing these limitations will require continued improvements in sequencing technologies, advanced bioinformatics algorithms, standardized analytical frameworks, and expanded genomic reference resources.

Future progress will increasingly depend on integrating environmental metagenomics with complementary multi-omics approaches—including metatranscriptomics, metaproteomics, metabolomics, and single-cell genomics—as well as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and genome-resolved metagenomic analyses. Such interdisciplinary integration will provide a more comprehensive understanding of microbial community dynamics, functional activity, and ecosystem responses to environmental change. Consequently, environmental metagenomics is poised to play an increasingly central role in addressing global environmental challenges, including climate change, biodiversity loss, environmental pollution, and antimicrobial resistance, while supporting evidence-based environmental governance, ecological restoration, and the development of resilient and sustainable ecosystems.

10. References

1. Amann, Rudolf, Ludwig, Wolfgang, & Schleifer, Karl-Heinz. (1995). Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiological Reviews, 59(1), 143–169.
2. Handelsman, Jo. (2004). Metagenomics: Application of genomics to uncultured microorganisms. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 68(4), 669–685.
3. Handelsman, Jo, Rondon, Michelle R., Brady, Sean F., Clardy, Jon, & Goodman, Robert M.. (1998). Molecular biological access to the chemistry of unknown soil microbes: A new frontier for natural products. Chemistry & Biology, 5(10), R245–R249.
4. Riesenfeld, Christian S., Goodman, Robert M., & Handelsman, Jo. (2004). Uncultured soil bacteria are a reservoir of new antibiotic resistance genes. Environmental Microbiology, 6(9), 981–989.
5. Tyson, Gene W., et al. (2004). Community structure and metabolism through reconstruction of microbial genomes from the environment. Nature, 428(6978), 37–43.
6. Venter, J. Craig, et al. (2004). Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the Sargasso Sea. Science, 304(5667), 66–74.
7. Tringe, Susannah G., & Rubin, Edward M.. (2005). Metagenomics: DNA sequencing of environmental samples. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6(11), 805–814.
8. Schloss, Patrick D., et al. (2009). Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 75(23), 7537–7541.
9. Caporaso, J. Gregory, et al. (2010). QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature Methods, 7(5), 335–336.
10. Thomas, Torsten, Gilbert, Jack A., & Meyer, Folker. (2012). Metagenomics—A guide from sampling to data analysis. Microbial Informatics and Experimentation, 2(1), 3.
11. Simon, Carola, & Daniel, Rolf. (2011). Metagenomic analyses: Past and future trends. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77(4), 1153–1161.
12. Knight, Rob, et al. (2018). Best practices for analysing microbiomes. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 16(7), 410–422.
13. Quince, Christopher, et al. (2017). Shotgun metagenomics, from sampling to analysis. Nature Biotechnology, 35(9), 833–844.
14. Parks, Donovan H., et al. (2017). Recovery of nearly 8,000 metagenome-assembled genomes substantially expands the tree of life. Nature Microbiology, 2, 1533–1542.
15. Wood, Derrick E., Lu, Jennifer, & Langmead, Ben. (2019). Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biology, 20, 257.
16. Beghini, Francesco, et al. (2021). Integrating taxonomic, functional, and strain-level profiling of diverse microbial communities with MetaPhlAn 3. Nature Biotechnology, 39(9), 1203–1212.
17. Li, Dinghua, et al. (2015). MEGAHIT: An ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly. Bioinformatics, 31(10), 1674–1676.
18. Seemann, Torsten. (2014). PROKKA: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics, 30(14), 2068–2069.
19. Segata, Nicola, et al. (2012). Metagenomic microbial community profiling using unique clade-specific marker genes. Nature Methods, 9(8), 811–814.
20. Meyer, Folker, et al. (2008). The metagenomics RAST server—A public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics, 9, 386.
21. Sunagawa, Shinichi, et al. (2015). Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science, 348(6237), 1261359.
22. Gilbert, Jack A., et al. (2014). Defining seasonal marine microbial community dynamics. The ISME Journal, 8(1), 1–11.
23. Thompson, Luke R., et al. (2017). A communal catalogue reveals Earth’s multiscale microbial diversity. Nature, 551(7681), 457–463.
24. Miller, Ian J., et al. (2023). Automating genome mining for natural product discovery using antiSMASH. Nucleic Acids Research, 51(W1), W46–W50.
25. Bodor, Attila, et al. (2020). Current trends and future perspectives of metagenomics in environmental monitoring. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 64, 203–213.